Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login
This site publishes selected articles from Biotech Daily. For more information click here for Biotech Daily at www.biotechdaily.com.au or Subscribe to Biotech Daily

Wednesday June 23, 2010

Daily news on ASX-listed biotechnology companies

subscribe to Biotech Daily at the link above or at www.biotechdaily.com.au

MARC SINATRA’S BIOGUIDE BRIEF: PHARMAXIS

Pharmaxis investors who were rushed for time yesterday and only read the first three paragraphs of the results of the second phase III trial of Bronchitol in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients would have gone to sleep very easily last night.

Those that took the time to read the fourth paragraph, however, would have had the words of Maxwell Smart ringing in their ears, “missed by that much”. Sleep would have come less easily for this group of investors.

For the record, the trial results were not that bad, with a range of secondary endpoints all demonstrating significant improvements.

However, when a company buries the main message, that the primary endpoint was missed, in the fourth paragraph of an announcement, alarm bells ring in the ears of investors.

If a company is willing to bury highly important information, what other information isn’t being released?

Obviously, a balance needs to be struck between what is and isn’t released and how announcements are structured to protect investors’ interests, but going too far does not ease the minds of investors. It just unsettles them.

That doubt is probably why Pharmaxis’ share price has ended up where it is, when most analysts, this one included, felt the share price would only fall 10 to 20 percent.

The key piece of data in all of this is that although Bronchitol did narrowly miss its primary endpoint in the second 318-patient phase III trial with a p-value of 0.059, it quite convincingly hit this end-point in the first 324-patient phase III trial with p < 0.001.

One possible reason for this discrepancy is the greater use of dornase alpha (Pulmozyme) in the second phase III study, where 75 percent of patients were on the drug compared to 55 percent in the first phase III study. Patients taking dornase alpha in the first trial showed a smaller, but still significant improvement in lung function compared to the study group as a whole.

The data Pharmaxis has produced on Bronchitol overall demonstrates that it is safe and effective. Coupling this with a patient group that is in dire need of new treatments, I cannot see the US Food and Drug Administration knocking it back.

This is also the view of Pharmaxis chairman Denis Hanley who told Biotech Daily: “I don't think the FDA will exclude registration on the basis of a technical data point on the placebo side of the equation. They will do a thorough analysis.”

The higher use of dornase alpha in the second phase III trial may have caused that “technical data point” Hanley is referring to.

While I do think that Bronchitol will get the FDA okay, I also think the data is telling us that Bronchitol is not a miracle drug for cystic fibrosis (CF) sufferers given the somewhat conflicting phase III data sets.

Nebulised saline which is thought to act in a similar manner to Bronchitol has been shown to increase lung function in CF patients and has been around for years, but it has had significant compliance issues among users.

From a side effect and ease of use point of view, Bronchitol does appear to have a significant edge over nebulised saline.

Having said that, of the 324 patients enrolled in the first phase III trial, only 170 felt compelled to enter the open-label phase of the trial where all patients received Bronchitol.

While the vast majority of the patients who opted not to enter the open-label phase of the study may have come from the control arm, whether this is the case or not isn’t clear. This number would tell us a lot about the likely take-up of Bronchitol among CF patients once it is on the market.

Those who managed to buy Pharmaxis shares today below $2 and especially those who bought at $1.655 have probably gotten a very early and valuable Christmas present.
Yesterday’s results are a speed bump, albeit a chassis rattling one, on Bronchitol’s march towards FDA approval.

Focus should now switch to the likely take up of Bronchitol by cystic fibrosis sufferers.

Regulatory approval is great, but sales are the be all and end all.

Marc Sinatra
Analyst

subscribe to Biotech Daily at the link above or at www.biotechdaily.com.au




39
Vote
   


Wednesday June 2, 2010

Daily news on ASX-listed biotechnology companies

subscribe to Biotech Daily at the link above or at www.biotechdaily.com.au

MARC SINATRA’S BIOGUIDE BRIEF: NOVOGEN

Novogen joined a club today that includes Neuren, Progen and Avexa - the club for companies that have taken un-partnered projects into pivotal trials only to see them fail.

Novogen’s phenoxodiol didn’t just fail, though; it bombed miserably with only one responder out of 142 ovarian cancer patients given the drug. This was despite a 30% response rate in a phase II trial.

It is hard to tell exactly what went wrong in the trial, but suffice to say that all of those companies who looked at licensing Phenoxodiol and chose not to, were right.

The vibe coming from Novogen when they closed the phase III trial in April of last year was not good. The company said the trial was closed for two reasons: one was that the global economic downturn made raising the funds to complete the trial difficult and the second was that a change in the standard-of-care for ovarian cancer patients during the trial period had slowed recruitment rates.

Nonetheless, the spectacular failure of the trial does raise ones eyebrows as to whether Novogen had an idea the trial would fail when they decided to close it early.

When I reviewed Novogen in 2007, I noted that a compound very similar to phenoxodiol, Sanofi Aventis’s flavopiridol, had been extensively studied for numerous indications and produced disappointing results, albeit with some success in ovarian cancer patients.

The combined results of phenoxodiol and flavopiridol do not auger well for Novogen’s other isoflavonoid-derived compounds and the company should probably review these compounds to see if it is really worth taking them forward.

On the positive side, there is interest in flavopiridol as a treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and results so far have been encouraging. So, all hope may not be lost for isoflavonoids.

The fortunes of Neuren, Progen, Avexa and, now, Novogen, suggest that investors be wary of companies taking un-partnered compounds into phase III trials.

However, Chemgenex’s Omapro, Pharmaxis’s Aridol and Peplin’s ingenol mebutate should ultimately gain marketing approval after the companies took their respective compounds into phase III trials on their own. It should be noted that some have hit a few fairly nasty speed bumps along the way.

All of this suggests that investors need to pick and choose which companies with un-partnered compounds they follow into phase III.

A few of the questions that should be asked are: has the company previously tried and failed to licence the compound; how solid are the phase II results; what will the phase III program cost and can the company access this level of funding; and has the company appropriately killed under-performing projects in the past?

Marc Sinatra
Analyst
subscribe to Biotech Daily at the link above or at www.biotechdaily.com.au




40
Vote
   


Thursday June 24, 2010

Daily news on ASX-listed biotechnology companies

subscribe to Biotech Daily at the link above or at www.biotechdaily.com.au

BIOTECH DAILY EDITORIAL

It is hard to tell what impact the changes in the Federal Labor Government announced today will have on our sector.

Apart from the departure of Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and the rise of Prime Minister Julia Gillard, the Minister for Finance and Member for Melbourne Lindsay Tanner has also announced his resignation as of the coming Federal election.

Mr Tanner has about one quarter of Australia’s biotechnology companies in his electorate of Melbourne, as well as a very large number of biotechnology workers.

But that didn’t help increase Federal funding for our sector

Biotech Daily was told last year that Commercialisation Australia was Prime Minister Rudd’s idea and Mr Tanner said in the Government’s first Budget in 2007 that he was proud to axe the Commercial Ready Scheme.

It appears that much of the Federal Ministry remains unchanged with Senator Kim Carr expected to continue as Minister for Innovation Industry Science and Research.

Biotech Daily has also been informed from several separate sources that Senator Carr strongly supports our sector and has fought for increased funding for biotechnology and will continue to do so.

It is highly unlikely that Commercialisation Australia will be axed in the immediate term.

But that doesn’t mean that we shall fare any better under a Gillard Labor Government.

The loss of Mr Rudd can be seen as a negative and the loss of Mr Tanner as a positive for the sector, although across other issues many would view the outcomes the other way around.

This writer is saddened by the departure of his Federal representative and occasional friend from university days.

Lindsay Tanner has been a very good local member of Parliament and an excellent No 1 ticket holder for the Essendon Football Club, but it is true to say that Lindsay Tanner inflicted the worst cuts to innovation and biotechnology.

It is possible that the next Member of the House of Representatives for Melbourne, either Labor unshackled by ministerial office, or Green, may be able to go into bat for our side somewhat harder.

Whether our sector will see any change between here and the election is unknown.

David Langsam
Editor

subscribe to Biotech Daily at the link above or at www.biotechdaily.com.au




40
Vote
   


Biotech Daily

Thursday July 1, 2010

[ Click here to read more ]
42
Vote
   


Tuesday June 8, 2010

Daily news on ASX-listed biotechnology companies

[ Click here to read more ]
36
Vote
   


Wednesday June 2, 2010

Daily news on ASX-listed biotechnology companies

[ Click here to read more ]
36
Vote
   


Wednesday May 26, 2010

Daily news on ASX-listed biotechnology companies

[ Click here to read more ]
39
Vote
   


Biotech Daily

Tuesday June 1, 2010

[ Click here to read more ]
56
Vote
   


Thursday May 13, 2010

Daily news on ASX-listed biotechnology companies

[ Click here to read more ]
48
Vote
   


Wednesday May 12, 2010

Daily news on ASX-listed biotechnology companies

[ Click here to read more ]
48
Vote
   


More Posts
4 Posts
7 Posts
2 Posts
503 Posts dating from August 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Biotech Daily Editor's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]